Comment on Colleague's Work

In CNN news, an article that talk about a former President Jimmy Carter who went on a trip to the Middle East to meet with leaders of Hamas, a Palestinian political party to negotiate the peace agreement between Egypt and Israel. The U.S. National Security Adviser, any democratic government and many Israelis don’t support with Carter. But instead, they insist that talks with Hamas won't bring peace in the Middle East conflict. For those who like Carter, he expresses his opinion strongly at the start of his trip by saying that “I’m not a negotiator. I'm just trying to understand different opinions and communicate, provide communications between people that won't communicate with each other,"



I agree with the person “let’s explore politics” that wrote the comment for the article, that I agree with what Carter is doing. What he did is the right thing that will bring peace to people. People might think that why would you want to talk to people who kill your own people? It is a very difficult thing to do. But that what’s President Carter did. He thinks that trying to communicate with the terrorist is a better solution. Unlike Israelis, who think that the only solution for this peace agreement is military. I don’t think it’s going to help much, but only can get into more war, and make many more innocent people to die. However, attacking and killing people are not a good solution. But communication for Carter is his solution in this situation. It will help to stop wars going on and will bring peace back to their people. Carter worked hard on peace. Others think that it’s not useful for people to communicate with a top Hamas politician. But in Carter’s view, it’s the only way that can solve the problem but not bring any damages to people. His only hope is peace. And he’s still stick to it. I am strongly agreed with Carter’s idea, with what he is doing for the better of people. The government should support and encourage people like Carter to involve in making peace.



The source http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/04/18/carter.hamas/index.ht



http://sarmila-letsexplorepolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/carter-meets-with-exiled-hamas-leader.html

What Will Happen With Our Social Security And Medicare Programs

http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/03/26/0326socsec.html

While everyone is currently focusing on the election and the war going on, not many people think about the problems will we will soon have to face in the near future. Perhaps it is not us that will have to face it, but it may be our children or children’s children that have to suffer this burden. What I am talking about is about our Social Security and also our Medicare programs.

The source of our problem dates back to after World War II during the time of the baby boomers. Nearly 80 millions babies were born between 1945 and 1964. The first wave of these baby boomers started to receive these benefits this year. Due to this occurrence, Social Security and Medicare will be unable to pay off any benefits beginning in 2019 and 2041 respectively.

President Bush turned our $5.6 trillion surplus that he inherited from former President Bill Clinton into a $3 trillion deficit, which made it even more difficult for future policy makers to strengthen the two programs. The problem also arises when President Bush wants to pursue tax cuts and also guarantee Social Security and Medicare to all Americans.

Sometime this year, Medicare will use all of the money that it receives through payroll taxes and will start to take out of the accumulated reserves. In about three years, that same thing will happen to Social Security. But due to the accumulated funds, both programs can still fully paying benefits for many more years. With this in mind, we have to change the way we are currently budgeting our expenses.

Outcome already decided?

Today, at roughly 12 PM, in a press conference, top strategist Mark Penn just claimed that Hillary Clinton would be a better commander-in-chief than both Barrack Obama and John McCain. Later on, at 1:55 PM, on National Review Online, Larry Kudlow concluded that it was over for Clinton. She was terminated brutally by Obama in Wisconsin and possibly in Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania too. In the article, Kudlow kept giving statistics after statistics, showing in concrete evidence how far left behind the Republican nominee was. Personally, I think the tone was a mixture of amusement and seriousness, as if the writer was treating this as a game that was better be taken seriously. Everyone seems to go with Obama, and the number of his white female voters even equals hers. I know that Obama has an advantage over Clinton since he does not have a husband – or wife in his case – who does not seem to be a lot of help lately, being harmful even; however, Clinton did not seem so bad and I did not expect her to lose badly like this. It seems that no matter what she does now, she cannot turn the table on Obama; in fact, the only thing she can do is withdrawing with grace before it gets even more humiliating. We now know the outcome of the primary before it ends. This is very different from how it is in my country, Vietnam. During many election years, the people are able to predict who would win but it is not because they are prophets or anything, but because there is only one party in Vietnam and many nominees, more often than not, are somehow related to those currently in power. Here in America, the system is more complicated yet simpler at the same time, ensuring a level of just and competitiveness in a presidential race. If the president ever turned out bad, the people could admit that it was their fault for voting for him or her, not some high-powers’ fault. It is reassuring.

Kudlow, Larry. “It’s Over.” National Review Online.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjA5OTJmZDZhM2ViMGNmNjE2MTVlMzkyNTE3NTU5Njg=

What Is Interesting About The next President

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDllOTBhNmUyMWY5YWZlM2Q1ODVkMWRjNGVmMmNmNjQ=

The article “Penn: Hillary Will Mount a Commander-In-Chief Offensive” by Byron York discuss about whom is the better person to be the next president of the United States of America. They believe that if Clinton becomes the next commander-in-chief, she probably is a person that can end the Iraq war. If the war ended, then the troops would be able to go home and that would make a lot of families happy. Basically nobody wants to have war; they want to have a peace, warm and gorgeous life. The author might want Clinton to be a next president because maybe he understands some things about the war, about the miserable and hardship that every single person who live in war has been suffering. More than that, Clinton follows democracy which means that everyone has freedom and will be considered equal to each other. When the time comes for everyone to vote, Hillary Clinton will probably have a better chance of becoming the next president because her husband used to be the president for two consecutive terms. During Bill Clinton’s term as president, he helped reduce the debt that the United States owe. When we see Hillary Clinton’s name on the ballot, we would automatically think of how her husband served and that would influence how people vote. On another note, Hillary Clinton is already well-known, more than Obama, when it comes to recognition. Due to those points alone, she has a better chance to be a president. The author might have the same opinion, maybe a lot of other people will think the same way too.

Who will be the next president???

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/us/politics/05cnd-delect.html?ref=politics

I think that this article is worth reading because there are a lot of people that lives under a rock and do not care whether who becomes president. Right now, the Democrats have two main candidates for presidency, Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama. Both candidates are fighting to get 1571 delegates. If one of them becomes the next president, it will be the first time in United States history that we have a female president or a black president. Personally, it does not matter to me whether Senator Clinton wins or Senator Obama wins, as long as the winner has the qualifications and skills to lead this country in the right path.

-